Analysis of Factors Causing Hate Speech on Instagram social media in the Comments Column of Lambe Turah's Instagram Account
Hate speech has become a disturbing social reality. Mistakes in translating the meaning of freedom of opinion become disputes that have legal consequences for the perpetrators. This research aims to determine the factors that cause the emergence and efforts to overcome hate speech. This research uses a qualitative approach and case study method. This research was analyzed using the Melvin Defleur model of individual differences theory which consists of three concepts, namely, selective exposure, selective perception and selective retention. Each other when they are exposed to the mass media. This can happen due to psychological differences, ways of thinking, influence of the surrounding environment, attitudes, values, religion, beliefs and so on. There is the influence of psychological elements that interact with exposure to mass media and produce effects. In this way, there is a strong link between media messages and the response of each individual. In efforts to overcome perpetrators who carry out hate speech on social media, there is a need for education for social media users and more equitable socialization. Because the socialization carried out by the government is currently still limited to certain groups, so those who are not affected by this socialization do not understand that there are ethics that must be understood when using social media so as not to be affected by the ITE Law. There are two ways that can be taken in carrying out socialization, namely socializing the importance of good social media, and it is also important to socialize the ITE Law (Electronic Transaction Interaction) as a guide for social media users so that they do not deal with legal problems.
Abidin, C., Xu, J., & Hutchinson, J. (2023). Influencer regulations, governance and sociocultural issues in Asia. In Policy & Internet. Wiley Online Library.
Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (1985). The origins of individual media-system dependency: A sociological framework. Communication Research, 12(4), 485–510.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications.
Czymara, C. S., & Dochow, S. (2018). Mass media and concerns about immigration in Germany in the 21st century: individual-level evidence over 15 years. European Sociological Review, 34(4), 381–401.
De Fleur, M. L. (1987). The Growth and Decline of Research on the Diffusion of the News, 1945-1985. Communication Research, 14(1), 109–130.
Fasel, M., & Weerts, S. (2024). Can Facebook’s community standards keep up with legal certainty? Content moderation governance under the pressure of the Digital Services Act. Policy & Internet.
Hennighausen, T. (2015). Exposure to television and individual beliefs: Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Comparative Economics, 43(4), 956–980.
Mak, M. K. F., Koo, A. Z.-X., & Rojas, H. (2024). Social media engagement against fear of restrictions and surveillance: The mediating role of privacy management. New Media & Society, 26(4), 1984–2005.
Mulyana, D. (2013). Ilmu Komunikasi Suatu Pengantar, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Paradikma Baru Ilmu Komunikasi dan Ilmu Sosial lainnya, Komunikasi PolitikBandung. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Munsch, S. (2014). Study protocol: psychological and physiological consequences of exposure to mass media in young women-an experimental cross-sectional and longitudinal study and the role of moderators. BMC Psychology, 2, 1–12.
Ningrum, D. J., Suryadi, S., & Wardhana, D. E. C. (2018). Kajian ujaran kebencian di media sosial. Jurnal Ilmiah KORPUS, 2(3), 241–252.
Permatasari, D. I., & Subyantoro, S. (2020). Ujaran Kebencian Facebook Tahun 2017-2019. Jurnal Sastra Indonesia, 9(1), 62–70.
Stanovich, K. E. (2018). How to think rationally about world problems. Journal of Intelligence, 6(2), 25.
Uchjana Effendy, O. (2006). Ilmu Komunikasi Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: Penerbit Remaja Rosda Karya.
Wettstein, M., & Wirth, W. (2017). Media Effects: How Media Influence Voters. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(3).
In order to be accepted and published by Adabi : Journal Of Public Administration And Business author(s) submitting the article manuscript should complete all the review stages. By submitting the manuscript the author(s) agreed to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Acces)
Similar Articles
- Aurelia Valentin Edward, Aldri Frinaldi, Implementation of Propemperda Policy in the Bukittinggi City DPRD Environment , Adabi : Journal of Public Administration and Business: Vol. 10 No. 2 (2023): December 2023
- Berian Hariadi, Susiyanti Meilina, Management of Land and Building Acquisition Taxes to Increase Regional Original Income , Adabi : Journal of Public Administration and Business: Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025): June 2025
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
