Determination of Community Readiness and Participation Post-Social Forestry Permit: Analysis of Internal and External Factors

Author


Suryaningsih Suryaningsih(1Mail),
(1) STISIP Imam Bonjol, Indonesia

Mail Corresponding Author
Article Analytic
  [File Size: 448KB]  Language: en
Available online: 2024-06-24  |  Published : 2024-06-24
Copyright (c) 2024 Suryaningsih Suryaningsih

Article can trace at:


Article Metrics

Abstract Views: 145 times PDF Downloaded: 62 times

Abstract


The Indonesian government persistently advocates for advancing social forestry initiatives as a component of economic equalization and forest conservation strategies. At the local level, particularly within Lima Puluh Kota Regency, the execution of this policy encounters various challenges. The substantial achievements in the area designated for social forestry do not correspond with the community's preparedness and engagement in managing the permits that have been allocated. This research aims to elucidate the community's readiness and involvement in the stewardship of social forestry post-permit acquisition. This investigation's adopted methodological framework is qualitative and centered around case studies. Data analysis will incorporate triangulation techniques to enhance the validity of the findings. The study's findings reveal that the community's readiness and participation following permit acquisition in Lima Puluh Kota Regency is notably insufficient, influenced by internal and external factors. Internal factors encompass a deficiency in knowledge and comprehension, economic constraints, and limitations within local institutions. External factors comprise inadequate budget allocations from the government, non-governmental organizations, and donor agencies, restricted market access and infrastructure, the predominance of local elites, and reliance on external support.

Keywords


Forest; Village; Social Forestry; Community Participation.

References


Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. (2003). Research design. Sage publications Thousand Oaks, CA.

Gunawan, H., Yeny, I., Karlina, E., Suharti, S., Murniati, Subarudi, Mulyanto, B., Ekawati, S., Garsetiasih, R., & Pratiwi. (2022). Integrating social forestry and biodiversity conservation in Indonesia. Forests, 13(12), 2152.

Maryudi, A., Sahide, M. A. K., Daulay, M. H., Yuniati, D., Syafitri, W., Sadiyo, S., & Fisher, M. R. (2022). Holding social forestry hostage in Indonesia: Contested bureaucracy mandates and potential escape pathways. Environmental Science & Policy, 128, 142–153.

Pambudi, A. S. (2023). Capaian, Tantangan Implementasi, Dan Rekomendasi Kebijakan Perhutanan Sosial Di Indonesia. Kebijakan Pemerintahan, 6 (2), 74–94.

Raco, J. . (2010). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Jenis, Karakteristik, dan Keunggulannya. PT. Grasindo.

Sahide, M. A. K., Fisher, M. R., Erbaugh, J. T., Intarini, D., Dharmiasih, W., Makmur, M., Faturachmat, F., Verheijen, B., & Maryudi, A. (2020). The boom of social forestry policy and the bust of social forests in Indonesia: Developing and applying an access-exclusion framework to assess policy outcomes. Forest Policy and Economics, 120, 102290.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (edisi 2). Alfabeta.

Tresno;, Ana, R. F. ;, Wicaksono, M., Wicaksanti, A. R. ., & Deswita, R. (2018). Antara Ulayat Adat dan Hutan Nagari: Sebuah Kebijakan Perhutanan Sosial di Minangkabau. JANTRO, 2(191–211).

Veriasa, T. O., Maulana, S. J., & Hariyadi, C. (Eds.). (2021). Perhutanan Sosial Asa Menjaga Sumber Daya Bersama: Kumpulan Studi Pembelajaran di Indonesia (Cetakan 1,). IPB Press.

Wahyuningsih, S. (2013). Metode Penelitian Studi Kasus. UTM Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.